1)
How
much influence have the European film movements of the 1920s and 1930s had on
contemporary cinema?
The content and style of films are shaped not
only by the example of previous creative works but by cultural and political
events and the urge for contrast and change. Bold film movements were born out
of the 1920’s and 30’s which developed very strong and individual cinematic
devices that have directly influenced contemporary cinema. The mood of the 1920’s
and 1930’s in Europe was a consequence of
World War One which finished in 1919. This brought about a ‘combination of
war-weariness and cynicism’ (Pg17, Ian Roberts, 2008) which prompted creative types to implement this
atmosphere in their work.
As a result of World War One the whole ‘political landscape
changed with bigger conflicts Europe was facing serious, deep-seated economic and
political problems’ (Pg.44. Ruth Henig. 2002) and filmakers
and artists wanted to adress this.
European film movements especially Soviet Montage
adopted a very opiniated theme of national traditionalism when faced with the
threat of American cinema’s influence saturating their culture along with it’s
capitalist messages. Soviet expressionism aimed to promote communist ideologies
through an individual style of filmaking. An urge for rebellion against
previous classical styles of cinema was felt across Europe which led many to
question and pull apart conventional cinematic rules. Contemporary cinema
borrows ideas from the European movements of the 20’s and 30’s to achieve
narrative, emotion and also to tackle issues which run parrallel to the struggles
felt in this era.
German expressionism is known by most to be the style of ‘extreme
angles and looming shadows.’ (Pg54 ,Barry Salt, 2006). But these things would
been ‘better described as "expressivist" features, since they had
already begun to develop well before’ (Pg54, Barry Salt, 2006). German
expressionism certainly took these elements and adopted them exclusively for
the dark and moody atmosphere that they aimed to produce. However ‘Germans only
developed trends that were already well underway elsewhere’ (61 Barry salt
2006). This is a great
example of how all-different types of cinema influences each other, so of
course European film movements have influenced contemporary cinema as well.
German expressionist film evolved from German
expressionist art, a movement which started evaporating by 1922 (Pg55, Barry Salt 2006). Artists found the medium of film to be well
suited to the task of accommodating for expressionist themes. Barry Salt says
that the German expressionist films were the six films:‘made between 1919 and 1924: namely Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari (RobertWiene, 1920), Genuine (Wiene, 1920), Von Morgens bis Mitternacht (K.H. Martin, 1920), Torgus (H. Kobe, 1921), Raskolnikov (Wiene, 1923), and Das Wachsfigurenkabinett (paul Leni, 1924).These are the only films in which most of the features are indebted to Expressionist painting and drama. The only arguable addition to this list is Fritz Lang's Metropolis (1926).’(Pg 55. Barry Salt. 2006).
In
German and French film movements filmmakers wanted to convey political
messages. There was a fear of the unknown and this was reflected in Fritz Langs
Metropolis arguably the last German Expressionist film. Here the dystopian
future of fascism is scary and will lead to doom. ‘The cityscape of Lang’s
Metropolis, to focus on just one film, is acknowledged influence for Ridley
Scott’s seminal science fiction film blade runner’ (Pg 2 Ian Roberts 2008) and has continued to be an
inspiration to contemporary filmmakers such as Tim Burton, Christopher Nolan
and The Wachowski brothers.
There is symbolism in Metropolis found in the image of a heart
machine driving the underbelly of the city to work. It transforms visually into
a Monster, which the workers are offered to as a sacrifice associating the machines
with man-eating monsters. If this isn’t a portrayal of the threat of technology
then I’m not sure what is. Stylistically Metropolis’s tower and heart machine
is uncanny to the architecture in Tim Burtons Batman Returns. In Batman there’s also a scene with a set of
statues pulling levers that is a direct reference to the M machine. It’s
interesting to note the similarity between Mr penguin and Dr Caligari in Robert
Weines The Cabinet of Dr Caligari.
Its not just the visual aspect
of the dystopian future which connects to conventional films. The whole ideology
of the threat of technology translates in The Wachowski Brothers The Matrix with the machines taking over
the humans and the same idea in Ridley Scotts Blade Runner with the replicants causing havoc. Metropolis also had
the aim of showing a Marxist theory of how bad society gets with a large class
gap, the bottom world and the top world symbolise the upper class and the
working class. They are literally worlds apart and this is a large part of the
symbolism in Blade Runner. (Pg 2. Ian
Roberts. 2008)
Lets get back to stylistic
conventions found in German expressionism. As I have already highlighted there
was the use of contrasts, shadows and emphasised low-key lighting but a huge
part of expressionism was the mise en scene, which was the composition,
cinematography and set design. Filmmakers juxtaposed the acting with the mise
en scene ‘the
expressionism associated with the human figure extends into every aspect of the
mise en scene’ (Pg106. Bordwell. 2002)
Bordwell says that the sets
should be ‘acting
or blending in with the actors’ (Pg 108 Bordwell) to emphasise the atmosphere.
Many of the sets in German Expressionist cinema such as in The Cabinet of Dr Caligari have a very distorted surreal nature to
reflect the mystical and otherworldly narrative and the emotion felt by the
characters. Many of the buildings and streets in the film are twisted and
uneven highlighting the unease felt by the characters and also making the
viewer feel uneasy themselves. Guillermo Del tauro’s Pan’s Labyrinth feature creepy settings to the main characters
imaginary world, the little girl’s psych is explored with beautiful and also
scary otherworldly scenes which the audience can connect with as a dreamlike
yet daunting journey. Tim Burton’s film Big
Fish also has this otherworldly narrative because within the film a man
tells his son the story of his life that is full of exaggerations and made up
fantasies.
Often dark dingy underworld
scenes have a gloomy and harsh aesthetic of muggy dark corners and the
emphasised low-key lighting helps this. Conventional films such as Seven owe a lot to this style, Sin City particularly with its use of
just black and white. Film Noir adopted the highly emphasised low-key lighting
to add mystery to dark characters and a seedy atmosphere to the urban
landscape. Its not just the lighting that film Noir borrowed however it was also
the heavy exploration of the psyche which expressionism captured. The moral dilemmas
that the protagonist has to overcome often resulting in them playing dirty to
achieve good. Contemporary Neo Noir films such as La Confidential explore these moral conflicts with the main
protagonist Sgt Exley having to disregard his strict legal police work
principles in order to achieve the greater good.
Original Film Noir is neither
German expressionism or contemporary cinema yet its important to note its bold stylisation
of set design within relation to lighting. Often stark light is shone through
blinds to cast a shadow on a character to symbolise that they are trapped.
Other set design conventions of German expressionism ‘included the
use of stylised surfaces, symmetry distortion and exaggeration and the
juxpostition of similar shapes’ (Pg 107. Bordwell. 2002). In Metropolis there is an industrial aesthetic to the M machine which
works with the clockwork movement of the workers. These workers are so
oppressed that they have been forced move like machinery devoid of human
emotion. Filmmakers sought to portray ‘stark images of city life emphasising
the dehumanised individual’ (Pg. 14, Ian Roberts. 2008). In German expressionism actors
use emphasised gestures to portray emotion and ‘actors dancelike movement may
combine with a stylised shape in the set’ (Pg. 107, Bordwell. 2002).
‘Directors
could portray the horrors abroad in the world which threatened to oppress and
overwhelm the weary individual; depictions of the individual ground down by the
twin beasts of capitalism and explorations of the human psyche and its extreme
states’ (Pg. 17. Ian Roberts. 2008)
Not only are the actor’s
movements juxtaposed with the scenery but also with the directing. Strong
attention was paid to the timing of movements of both the actors and the camera
aiming for them to move in tandem. Soviet montage focused on the arrangement of
scenes around each other concentrating on the timing and layout of editing.
Montage is from the French to assemble and Soviet filmmakers concentrated on
assembling scenes of films in different ways to achieve different cinematic
effects.
‘Such
editing reflects the directors belief that cuts, in and of themselves stimulate
the spectator’ (Pg131. Bordwell. 2008)
Lev Kuleshov a student of
Russia’s film school in Moscow (the VGIK) proved so innovative that he was
allowed his own workshop. Here they studied editing and dissected other films
researching the impact that different edits had. The Kuleshov effect is best
shown by his experiments of putting the same shot of a man’s face in three
separate films each followed by a different shots, a bowl of soup, a dead
person and a seductive girl. Although the shot of the man is the same the
spectators were amazed at the range of emotions that he portrayed, of course it
was the context of the clip after which gave him the emotion. Another technique
used by Soviet filmmakers was the use of ‘similtanous actions in different
places’ (Pg133. Bordwell. 2008), which work together to symbolise the power or political
consequence of the other action such as a massacre being like a slaughter:
‘In
the final scenes of the film Strike the shooting down of work men is
punctuated by shots of the slaughter of a bull in a stockyard. The scenarist,
as it were, desires to say: just as a butcher fells a bull with the swing of a
pole-axe, so, cruelly and in cold blood, were shot down the workers. This
method is especially interesting because, by means of editing, it introduces an
abstract;concept into the consciousness of the spectator without use of a
title.’(Pg 125 – 126. Pudovkin. 1992)
Soviet filmmakers experimented
with slowing down some scenes and quickening up the pace of others for
cinematic effect. Quicker pace would denote frenzy whilst slowing down might
show a contemplative mood, moment of clarity or a realisation of what has
happened. Scorsese uses all these techniques in The Departed and The Aviator
as well as freeze framing to emphasise important pauses as well as elements of
time and nostalgia. Wes Anderson is a perfectionist when it comes to mise en scene;
in Moonrise Kindgdom his tracking
shots are perfectly choreographed. He synchronises the scene with objects
coming in and out the shot at exactly the right time like Fritz Lang’s
persistence for the action in Metropolis to be perfectly composed. The long
shots capture a tension and play the character through a scene with the setting
opening up to the viewer whilst it opens up to the character. His visuals are
stylised with a storybook, surreal aesthetic, which transports the viewer into
the otherworldly scene much like how Robert Weiner creates a surreal setting in
The Cabinet of Dr Caligari.
Menilolment by Dimitri karsenov was
one of the later French impressionism films which was made in 1926 it used
circular fade outs, overlaying video and clips running parallel. Like Soviet
Montage and German expressionism, French impressionism featured heavily the
importance of mise en scene. In fact it was Georges Meiliers Trip to the Moon in 1903 which was the first to use surreal
mise en scene to set a fantasy so many argue that it was Georges Melies who first
used Mise en scene in film:
‘Georges
Melies (1861 – 1938), whose films explored new frontiers within fantasy
fiction, trick film, and elaborate mise-en-scene’ (Pg32, R.F. Lanzani, 2002)
Unlike German expressionism
French impressionism didn’t have a narrative as such because impressionists
said that cinema should not have theatrical narratives:
‘The
idea stems from the impressionists belief that emotions, rather than stories
should be the basis for films’(Pg91, Bordwell. 2002).
Movement was juxtaposed with
shot lengths, which created a rhythm to the film. French impressionists tried
to give an object a new expressiveness by using different perspectives. They
coined this term photogenie and the function of achieving photogenie was by
camerawork be it through using optical devices that enhanced the beauty of an
image or through optical tricks such a filters that suggested subjectivity. An
example of this is in L’Herbier’s El
Dorado (1921) where the performer is lost in worry about her sick son. A
filter blurs her figure out with the women around her in focus suggesting how’s
she’s vacant, when the women speaks to her the filter disappears and she comes
into focus. (Pg91,
Bordwell. 2002).
In the Bourne series the main
character Jason Bourne has flashbacks prompted by what he see’s in real time
which engulf his vision and distract him. This juxtaposition of flashbacks with
real time owes itself more to Soviet Montage than to French impressionism. Yet
the aesthetics of the visual interpretation of the flashbacks are subdued by
filters creating a dreamlike, fragmented memory and this relates directly to
optical tricks used in French impressionism. Clips were also overlaid such as
in Menilmontant, when the heroine is
contemplating suicide a clip of a flowing river is overlaid to portray her
emotional turmoil (Pg. 92, Bordwell. 2002).
At the same time in the 1920’s
futurist artists such as Hans Richter were experimenting with abstract film.
Richter would show different shapes moving in and out of each other and around
the screen in different tempos to give the sensations of agitation, peace or
time. Alfred Hitchcock adopts the movement of shapes and colour in a scene in Vertigo. In Scotty’s nightmare spirals,
flashings of colour and shapes move in and out the frame psychedelically creating
the impression of him going crazy about the death of Judy.
Although Hitchcock is not
contemporary cinema its important to mention how he was a great advocate of
Soviet Montage editing with the scene at the end of north by northwest of the
train going into the tunnel symbolising the two lovers having sex. Stanley
Kubrick also used this type of editing to emphasise the development of man from
bone wielding ape to astronauts with the bone spinning into the air to cut to a
spinning spaceship in 2001 a Space Odyssey.
Kubrick like Wes Anderson and Fritz Lang was obsessed with timing of action in
a scene and the composition of shapes in a space. In 2001 the movement of
different shaped spacecraft’s in space composed aesthetically on the screen
makes for a mesmerising and at times hypnotic experience.
Finally we can look at how
composition in conjunction with camera angles and other objects in a scene puts
across emotional feelings in the characters such as dominance or desperation by
using the example of American Beauty (1999).
In the scene where Lester is meeting with his boss Brad, Lester is presented in
a certain way. He occupies a small part of the frame in the middle of an almost
empty room totally exposed. The room is utilitarian, ugly, dark and grey with a
dying plant in the corner symbolising how the company sucks the life out of its
employees. The composition of the shot is ugly filling the viewer with the feeling
of discomfort mirroring Lester’s annoyance. In comparison Brad occupies a large
portion of the frame and the camera is looking up at him presenting him as
dominant with hard, sharp and threatening objects on his desk giving powerful
dominance of Lester.
In conclusion contemporary
cinema without doubt takes influence from the European film movements of the
1920’s and 1930’s. Soviet Montage concentrated on the editing of scenes around
other scenes to create various cinematic devices. By showing different scenes
in parallel, one can act as an analogy of another and this has transferred into
Hitchcock’s films. It is also used in some contemporary films such as Hot Fuzz as a comic device. The
surrealist settings of German expressionism films are used to display emotion
and filmmakers such as Tim Burton and Ridley Scott do this too. Guilermo Del
Tormo on the other hand have used surrealist settings to denote a characters
dreamlike world or hallucinations. German expressionism emphasised low key
lighting and shadowy corners and this has had the most influence on Film Noir.
Contemporary Neo Noir has expanded on this and films such as Sin City have
combined the stark lighting with surreal aesthetics. Contemporary films owe
almost everything to these innovative film movements of the 1920’s and 1930’s
and filmmakers will continue to look back at these films for inspiration for
many years to come.
Bibliography
Ian Roberts, German Expressionist Cinema: The World of Light and Shadow Wallflower Press, 2008
Ruth Henig, Versailles and After, 1919-1933, Taylor and Francis 2002
Barry Salt, Moving Into Pictures: More on Film History, Style, and Analysis. Starword 2006
David Bordwell and Kristin Thompson, Film History an introduction, McGraw-Hill Education, 2010
Batman Returns. 1992. Tim Burton
The Cabinet Of Dr Caligari. 1920. Robert Weine
Metropolis. 1927. Fritz Lang
Fievre. 1921. Louis Delluc
Genuine. 1920. Robert Weine
Von Morgens Bis Mitternacht. 1920. Kit Martin
Torgus. 1921. H.Kobe
Raskolnikov. 1924. Paul leni
Blade Runner. 1982. Ridley Scott
The Matrix. 1999. The Wachowski Brothers
Pans Labyrinth. 2006. Guilermo Del Tauro
Hot Fuzz. 2007. Edgar Wright
Big Fish. 2003. Tim Burton
Seven. 1995. David Fincher
Sin City. 2005. Frank Miller
LA Confidential. 1997. Curtis Hanson
The Departed. 2006. Martin Scorsese
The Aviator. 2004. Martin Scorsese
Moonrise Kindgom. 2012. Wes Anderson
Trip to the Moon. 1903. Georges Melies
L’Herbier. El Dorado. 1921
Bourne Ultimatum. Paul Greengrass. 2007
Menilmontant. Dimitri Kirsanoff. 1926
Vertigo. Alfred Hitchcock. 1958
2001. A Space Odyssey. 1968. Stanley Kubrick
American Beauty. 1999. Sam Mendes
No comments:
Post a Comment