Friday, 14 April 2017

'Silenced' Short Film Production Reflective Essay

Alice came up with the idea of a story that would incorporate our evolving technology as a catalyst for a change on how we live in the future.  Her Story premise was that our rate of texting has increased so much that we have lost the power of speech almost like our primary mode of communication has changed so that talking has become redundant and therefore extinct. The film name ‘Silenced’ is quite fitting because as a society we are becoming silenced by technology.

Our film is a comment on our society today and a peek into a future that we may soon inhabit. The nature of a film like this is that it represents a future that we see as very close around the corner and can even relate to how we are living now. Therefore the viewer feels horror through the realisation of the likenesses between the film world and ours and an anxiety that we are a switch of a button away from this dystopian future.

A press release for the series 'Black Mirror' says that it 'taps into our contemporary unease about our modern world'. We wanted ‘Silenced’ to be a 'twisted parable for the twitter age' (Channel 4, 2011) acting almost as a warning for our society on what can be possible in a technology obsessed culture.

In the opening scene of 'Silenced' we are looking at a world where everyone is constantly on their phones texting. As the Camera Man I filmed a lot of footage in the centre of Leeds so that the sheer volume of footage could be compiled to create a seething mass of people attached to their phones. I feel that the clips of people sped up juxtaposed with a huge number texts popping up around them showed this. A couple of shots later Max our protagonist and his friend bump into each other because they are so distracted from the world around them. I shot the lead up to the bump from behind Max so that the viewer could see his friend bump into him in plain sight and identify how engulfed in his phone Max is.

One thing I didn’t do very well in this scene was the camera angles in relation to which friend is texting. I filmed the bump from directly side on to the couple so that it was a mutual and non-biased contact. By doing this it didn’t look like one of them initiated the bump and emphasised that they’re both as engaged with their phone as each other and I think this was a good choice.

When I saw Alice’s script I began by story boarding all the 24 shots on paper so that I could plan them out and refer back to them before shooting. My original idea was to shoot it hand-held style much like ‘The Blair Witch Project’ (1999), in films like this it puts the viewer inside the eyes of the character. I then came up with the idea of it actually being filmed on the phone camera, almost like the character is being viewed by the phone but is unaware of it filming. By doing this it would give the looming impression that they are being watched at all times by these omnipresent sentinels.

The camera also acts as a filter for the user, our phone acts as a vessel to live our lives through and I thought that I could symbolise this by filming through it. When we use our phones we are viewing the world through them, trapped inside our technology so I tried to come up with the idea of showing this viewpoint. There’s many practise shots I did this way on my blog however we didn’t shoot in this way in the end. We came to the agreement that we would film the conventional way but I think it would have looked better filmed from the phone because it would have been easier to see who’s texting who.

We opted for the look of the texts that are done in the BBC’s ‘Sherlock’ (2010). In this the text is solid, white and simple font just hovering beside the characters. We chose no bubble around the text because this can easily look out-dated and tacky. The words are next to the phone but hover independently to it so that they aren’t bouncing around unable to be read.

I think the biggest flaw of our film was in the texts however. It’s hard to read all of the words because they’re not on the screen long enough and the texts are too long. I also think that apart from the title sequence there shouldn’t be more than one text on the screen at one time because one text distracts the eyes from the other. I also think that on some of the shots they are positioned wrong, one characters texts shouldn’t come to the side of their phone and then a shot later to the side of someone else’s phone. I feel that instead of filming short takes I should have shot longer ones to allow sufficient time for the texts to be displayed.

Our phone use is almost like drug use and the fact that people become addicted to their phones is testament to this. In ‘Silenced’ there is a scene where Alex the main characters phone is running out of battery and as it does so he starts to be drained of energy. This provides the viewer with the imagery that he is suffering from withdrawal from his phone, it’s his drug, his source of energy. Our phones today are almost like an extension of our selves. They contain everything about us, our means of communication, our profiles of our friends and they even contain our memories. So by losing our connection to our phone we are almost losing our self and this is what we wanted to portray in this scene. When filming this I decided to emphasise how he was out of energy by swaying the camera from side to side.

As his energy levels get lower and lower so does he and so does my filming. I end up filming with the camera on the floor at his eye-line to symbolise his energy levels being almost completely zapped. In the scene where the three friends are watching television I thought it would be a good idea to view them straight on and from above so that the viewer could articulate fully how none of them are really looking at each other. I think that the texts could have been better positioned perhaps on top of the character it belongs to instead of them all in a line down one side.

The film ‘Casablanca’ was overlaid on top of the three friends in post-production to make it seem like the camera was inside the TV. This echoes how the text and battery symbol comes up on the screen like we’re viewing the action from the viewpoint of technology. It’s hardly noticeable in the final film however and so I think we should have made it more obvious. Only at the end when Max runs out of the restaurant shouting does the view point change and no battery or text comes up. This symbolises how he breaks free from the entrapment of his phone.

The scene in the restaurant needed to be almost completely re-shot because on the first attempt it was too dark, this I should have planned better. To combat this the second time round we brought along some studio lighting. The problem was that in the restaurant there were a lot of mirrors so we needed to be extra careful that an edge of a light stand wasn’t visible in a mirror. In this scene I think it’s difficult to see whom the battery symbol relates to, this could have been fixed by showing it flashing on the screen only when Max is in the shot.

Finally we had some problems with the sound in the last scene where Max runs out so we had to do a couple more takes. Unlike the rest of the film where music and text noise was dubbed over the top, here we needed to hear Max’s shouting so it was crucial. On reflection I think we’re missing an obvious part of the film that is stated in its title; silence should have been used more as a cinematic device.

Nothing says sterile and emotionless like silence does and yet it can also be very haunting. The title sequence could have been without music; silence with just the noises of texts coming up would have given it a monotonous and cold feeling. There’s no vibrancy, no warmth in a world without speech and the lack of talking and background chatter could have been so much clearer without any music at all. Perhaps white noise should have been put on top. When music from one scene rolls onto the next scene it can be quite confusing. The complexity of the theme and the practicalities of a film without speech posed many challenges and I now have a huge amount of insight into how I would resolve the aforementioned technical difficulties in a future production.











Bibliography


The Blair Witch Project (1999) Directed by Daniel Myrick. Orlando Canada: Haxan Films.


Sherlock (2010) BBC One Television

No comments:

Post a Comment